We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Sonic and ultrasonic oscillating devices for the management of pain and dental fear in children or adolescents that require caries removal: a systematic review.
BMJ Open 2018 April 29
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and degree of acceptance by children and adolescents of the use of oscillating tips compared with rotating drills.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science (October 2017).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled randomised or non-randomised trials that evaluated sonic and ultrasonic oscillating devices versus rotating drill.
DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies were selected and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Method.
RESULTS: Two controlled clinical trials comprising 123 children aged 2-12 years old were identified. Both trials were at high risk of selection bias and unclear risk of detection bias. In one trial, pain due to the use of oscillating drill resulted lower than employing rotating drill (Verbal Hochman Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.00); Visual Facial Expression Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94)). In another study, compared with traditional drill ultrasonic tip was associated with a lower level of patient's discomfort (RR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.79)) but not with dental anxiety (RR 1.29 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.71)). The effectiveness of the removal of caries as well as fillings durability were only considered in one study, but no statistically significant differences were found between the two interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence based on two low-quality studies was insufficient to conclude that the use of oscillating tips for the management of pain and dental fear in children or adolescents compared with rotating drills was more effective.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science (October 2017).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled randomised or non-randomised trials that evaluated sonic and ultrasonic oscillating devices versus rotating drill.
DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies were selected and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Method.
RESULTS: Two controlled clinical trials comprising 123 children aged 2-12 years old were identified. Both trials were at high risk of selection bias and unclear risk of detection bias. In one trial, pain due to the use of oscillating drill resulted lower than employing rotating drill (Verbal Hochman Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.00); Visual Facial Expression Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94)). In another study, compared with traditional drill ultrasonic tip was associated with a lower level of patient's discomfort (RR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.79)) but not with dental anxiety (RR 1.29 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.71)). The effectiveness of the removal of caries as well as fillings durability were only considered in one study, but no statistically significant differences were found between the two interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence based on two low-quality studies was insufficient to conclude that the use of oscillating tips for the management of pain and dental fear in children or adolescents compared with rotating drills was more effective.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app