We have located links that may give you full text access.
Endogenous testosterone does not improve prediction of incident cardiovascular disease in a community-based cohort of adult men: results from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.
Aging Male : the Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male 2018 April 28
INTRODUCTION: To explore the predictive value of testosterone added to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
METHODS: Among 816 men, 30-70 years/old, without prevalent CVD, from a community-based cohort (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study), we assessed the predictive value of testosterone with incident CVD, using three multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Model I: FRS variables; model II: Model I plus total testosterone; model III: Model II plus Systolic blood pressure (SBP) * total testosterone (the best fit interaction-term between testosterone and FRS variables). Discriminations and goodness-of-fit were assessed by the C-statistic and the approach of Grønnesby, respectively. p Value <.05 was significant.
RESULTS: During 12 years of follow-up, 121 CVD events occurred. In all models, age, treated SBP, smoking, and diabetes were associated with increased CVD (p values <.05). Neither testosterone (models II and III), nor SBP * testosterone (model III) were associated with CVD (p values >.05). The C-statistics for models I, II, and III were 0.819, 0.820, and 0.821, respectively, indicating no significant improvement in the discrimination power. The models' goodness-of-fit did not improve compared with the FRS.
CONCLUSION: Testosterone could not add to the predictive value of FRS for CVD in men, either directly, or through interactions with FRS variables.
METHODS: Among 816 men, 30-70 years/old, without prevalent CVD, from a community-based cohort (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study), we assessed the predictive value of testosterone with incident CVD, using three multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Model I: FRS variables; model II: Model I plus total testosterone; model III: Model II plus Systolic blood pressure (SBP) * total testosterone (the best fit interaction-term between testosterone and FRS variables). Discriminations and goodness-of-fit were assessed by the C-statistic and the approach of Grønnesby, respectively. p Value <.05 was significant.
RESULTS: During 12 years of follow-up, 121 CVD events occurred. In all models, age, treated SBP, smoking, and diabetes were associated with increased CVD (p values <.05). Neither testosterone (models II and III), nor SBP * testosterone (model III) were associated with CVD (p values >.05). The C-statistics for models I, II, and III were 0.819, 0.820, and 0.821, respectively, indicating no significant improvement in the discrimination power. The models' goodness-of-fit did not improve compared with the FRS.
CONCLUSION: Testosterone could not add to the predictive value of FRS for CVD in men, either directly, or through interactions with FRS variables.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app