Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Lordosis Re-Creation in TLIF and PLIF: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.

Spine 2018 April 25
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF & PLIF) OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis re-creation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although re-creation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis re-creation.

METHODS: Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 18° lordotic and 27 mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy, PLIF with bilateral cages (18°, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (24°, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and 'insert and rotate' technique.

RESULTS: Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2° with each procedural step (Lordosis increase was serially 1.8°, 3.5°, 1.6°, 2.5° & 1.6° through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with posterior column osteotomy increased lordosis significantly compared with Unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis re-creation were posterior column osteotomy, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and posterior column osteotomy optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app