We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of the prognostic value of different skeletal muscle radiodensity parameters in endometrial cancer.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2018 April 26
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Recent data have shown that dividing skeletal muscle (SM) into sub-ranges of radiodensity can improve the prediction of short-term outcomes in the oncology setting. We aim to investigate whether the skeletal muscle mass, when divided into sub-ranges of low or high-radiodensity, improves the prediction of short-term survival in endometrial cancer (EC) patients when compared to average muscle attenuation and to the overall skeletal muscle radiodensity.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: EC patients who had computed tomography (CT) images available within 30 days before treatment were enrolled in this retrospective cohort (n = 232). CT images at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) were used to assess overall skeletal muscle index (SMI). Then we divided SMI into sub-ranges of radiation attenuation: low-radiodensity skeletal muscle index (LRSMI) and high-radiodensity skeletal muscle index (HRSMI). The average muscle radiation attenuation was also assessed. Low SMI was defined when SMI was <38.9 cm2 /m2 . One-year survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Regression.
RESULTS: Sarcopenia was found in 25.8% of the patients. Roughly 80% of the patients in the highest quartile of LRSMI were obese. All the skeletal muscle parameters were significantly associated with shorter 1-year survival, LRSMI presented a trend for significance in the adjusted model. When the SM parameters were additionally adjusted for low SMI, only HRSMI and LRSMI remained in the model as early-mortality predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Classifying the skeletal muscle into sub-ranges of radiodensity have an additional value than using the average muscle attenuation of the overall skeletal muscle area and should be exploited in further studies.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: EC patients who had computed tomography (CT) images available within 30 days before treatment were enrolled in this retrospective cohort (n = 232). CT images at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) were used to assess overall skeletal muscle index (SMI). Then we divided SMI into sub-ranges of radiation attenuation: low-radiodensity skeletal muscle index (LRSMI) and high-radiodensity skeletal muscle index (HRSMI). The average muscle radiation attenuation was also assessed. Low SMI was defined when SMI was <38.9 cm2 /m2 . One-year survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Regression.
RESULTS: Sarcopenia was found in 25.8% of the patients. Roughly 80% of the patients in the highest quartile of LRSMI were obese. All the skeletal muscle parameters were significantly associated with shorter 1-year survival, LRSMI presented a trend for significance in the adjusted model. When the SM parameters were additionally adjusted for low SMI, only HRSMI and LRSMI remained in the model as early-mortality predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Classifying the skeletal muscle into sub-ranges of radiodensity have an additional value than using the average muscle attenuation of the overall skeletal muscle area and should be exploited in further studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app