We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Timing of advanced airway management by emergency medical services personnel following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population-based cohort study.
Resuscitation 2018 July
BACKGROUND: Early prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel has been intended to improve patient outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, few studies examine the effectiveness of early prehospital AAM. We investigated whether early prehospital AAM was associated with functionally favourable survival after adult OHCA.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of OHCA in Osaka, Japan, between 2005 and 2012. We included all consecutive, non-traumatic adult OHCA in which EMS personnel performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AAM. Main exposure was time from CPR to AAM. Primary outcome was functionally favourable survival at one-month. As the primary analysis, we estimated adjusted odds ratio (OR) of time from CPR to AAM using multivariable logistic regression in the original cohort. In the secondary analysis, we divided the time from CPR to AAM into early (0-4 min) and late (5-29 min). We calculated propensity scores (PS) for early AAM and performed PS-matching.
RESULTS: We included 27,471 patients who received prehospital AAM by EMS personnel. In this original cohort, time from CPR to AAM was inversely associated with functionally favourable survival (adjusted OR 0.90 for one-increment of minute, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.94). In the PS-matched cohort of 17,022 patients, early AAM, compared to late AAM, was associated with functionally favourable survival: 2.2% vs 1.4%; adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Earlier prehospital AAM by EMS personnel was associated with functionally better survival among adult patients who received AAM.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of OHCA in Osaka, Japan, between 2005 and 2012. We included all consecutive, non-traumatic adult OHCA in which EMS personnel performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AAM. Main exposure was time from CPR to AAM. Primary outcome was functionally favourable survival at one-month. As the primary analysis, we estimated adjusted odds ratio (OR) of time from CPR to AAM using multivariable logistic regression in the original cohort. In the secondary analysis, we divided the time from CPR to AAM into early (0-4 min) and late (5-29 min). We calculated propensity scores (PS) for early AAM and performed PS-matching.
RESULTS: We included 27,471 patients who received prehospital AAM by EMS personnel. In this original cohort, time from CPR to AAM was inversely associated with functionally favourable survival (adjusted OR 0.90 for one-increment of minute, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.94). In the PS-matched cohort of 17,022 patients, early AAM, compared to late AAM, was associated with functionally favourable survival: 2.2% vs 1.4%; adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Earlier prehospital AAM by EMS personnel was associated with functionally better survival among adult patients who received AAM.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app