We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of Upright and Slouched Sitting Postures on the Respiratory Muscle Strength in Healthy Young Males.
Objective: The present study compared the effects of upright and slouched sitting postures on the respiratory muscle strength in healthy young males.
Methods: A total of 35 adult male subjects aged 18-35 years participated in this study. Respiratory muscle strength was determined by measurement of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) using a MicroRPM device in the upright and slouched sitting positions. The subjects were asked to perform the pulmonary function test including peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1 /FVC ratio at baseline. Body composition was also determined.
Results: There was a significant difference of SNIP score between upright sitting and slouched sitting positions ( p = 0.04). The mean difference of SNIP score between upright sitting and slouched sitting positions was 8.7 cmH2 O. Significant correlations were found between SNIP in upright sitting and FEV1 % predicted values [ R = .651], SNIP in slouched sitting and FEV1 % predicted values [ R = .579], and SNIP in upright sitting and SNIP in slouched sitting positions [ R = .926] ( p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant correlations between SNIP scores, demographic variables, and other baseline clinical data ( p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The slouched sitting position had a lower SNIP score compared to upright sitting position suggesting a reduced diaphragm tension and movement as a result of altered body posture.
Methods: A total of 35 adult male subjects aged 18-35 years participated in this study. Respiratory muscle strength was determined by measurement of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) using a MicroRPM device in the upright and slouched sitting positions. The subjects were asked to perform the pulmonary function test including peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1 /FVC ratio at baseline. Body composition was also determined.
Results: There was a significant difference of SNIP score between upright sitting and slouched sitting positions ( p = 0.04). The mean difference of SNIP score between upright sitting and slouched sitting positions was 8.7 cmH2 O. Significant correlations were found between SNIP in upright sitting and FEV1 % predicted values [ R = .651], SNIP in slouched sitting and FEV1 % predicted values [ R = .579], and SNIP in upright sitting and SNIP in slouched sitting positions [ R = .926] ( p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant correlations between SNIP scores, demographic variables, and other baseline clinical data ( p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The slouched sitting position had a lower SNIP score compared to upright sitting position suggesting a reduced diaphragm tension and movement as a result of altered body posture.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app