We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Dose Distribution Optimization in Combined Intracavitary and Interstitial Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer].
PURPOSE: Hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization (HIPO) is a new optimization tool for brachytherapy. We verified its utility using treatment plans for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in cervical cancer.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We compared the manually optimized plan and the plan optimized using HIPO. The plan using HIPO was optimized with three different methods: needle only, tandem and needle, and all applicators. The dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters such as D90 of high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and D2cc of OAR (rectum, sigmoid colon and bladder) were used to evaluate each treatment plan.
RESULTS: The D90 of HR-CTV in most plans was received more than 600 cGy. In addition, the D2cc of OAR also was less than the tolerance dose on the average of all plans. However, the D2cc of the rectum and bladder treatment plans optimized only with needles was significantly higher than other plans.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment plans used in clinical practice and obtained by HIPO have similar dose distributions and DVH parameters. Moreover, the time needed to create treatment plan was reducing by HIPO. We suggest that HIPO will be an effective tool in treatment planning.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We compared the manually optimized plan and the plan optimized using HIPO. The plan using HIPO was optimized with three different methods: needle only, tandem and needle, and all applicators. The dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters such as D90 of high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and D2cc of OAR (rectum, sigmoid colon and bladder) were used to evaluate each treatment plan.
RESULTS: The D90 of HR-CTV in most plans was received more than 600 cGy. In addition, the D2cc of OAR also was less than the tolerance dose on the average of all plans. However, the D2cc of the rectum and bladder treatment plans optimized only with needles was significantly higher than other plans.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment plans used in clinical practice and obtained by HIPO have similar dose distributions and DVH parameters. Moreover, the time needed to create treatment plan was reducing by HIPO. We suggest that HIPO will be an effective tool in treatment planning.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app