We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
The influence of mTOR inhibitors on the incidence of CMV infection in high-risk donor positive-recipient negative (D+/R-) kidney transplant recipients.
INTRODUCTION: Several studies and meta-analysis suggest the mTOR inhibitors are associated with reduced incidence of CMV infection after kidney transplantation, although their effects on the high-risk population have not been investigated thoroughly.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study investigates the association between immunosuppression and CMV infection in D+/R- kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy.
METHODS: All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, prednisone and azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate (MPA) or everolimus (EVR).
RESULTS: Among 89 D+R-, the overall incidence of CMV infection was 76%, with no difference among the groups AZA vs MPA vs EVR (73 vs 83 vs 74%, P = 0.643). CMV infection occurred later (31 in AZA vs 31 in MPA vs 43 days in EVR group, P < 0.001) and showed a lower trend of recurrences (57% in AZA vs 79% in MPA vs 48% in EVR group, P = 0.058) in the everolimus group. There were no differences in the IgG seroconversion rate (82% in AZA vs 76% in MPA vs 72% in EVR group, P = 0.983). There were no differences in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% in AZA vs 8% in MPA vs 6% in EVR group, P = 0.811) and renal function at 12 months (53.6 in AZA vs 60.3 in MPA vs. 55.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 in EVR group).
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of high-risk CMV D+/R- kidney transplant recipients receiving rATG induction and tacrolimus, the use of mTOR inhibitors could only show a tendency towards but not a significant difference on the incidence of CMV events, when compared to antimetabolites.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study investigates the association between immunosuppression and CMV infection in D+/R- kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy.
METHODS: All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, prednisone and azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate (MPA) or everolimus (EVR).
RESULTS: Among 89 D+R-, the overall incidence of CMV infection was 76%, with no difference among the groups AZA vs MPA vs EVR (73 vs 83 vs 74%, P = 0.643). CMV infection occurred later (31 in AZA vs 31 in MPA vs 43 days in EVR group, P < 0.001) and showed a lower trend of recurrences (57% in AZA vs 79% in MPA vs 48% in EVR group, P = 0.058) in the everolimus group. There were no differences in the IgG seroconversion rate (82% in AZA vs 76% in MPA vs 72% in EVR group, P = 0.983). There were no differences in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% in AZA vs 8% in MPA vs 6% in EVR group, P = 0.811) and renal function at 12 months (53.6 in AZA vs 60.3 in MPA vs. 55.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 in EVR group).
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of high-risk CMV D+/R- kidney transplant recipients receiving rATG induction and tacrolimus, the use of mTOR inhibitors could only show a tendency towards but not a significant difference on the incidence of CMV events, when compared to antimetabolites.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app