We have located links that may give you full text access.
Transmuscular Ultrasonography of the Placement of Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screws: A Cadaveric Study.
World Neurosurgery 2018 July
BACKGROUND: Transpedicular screw fixation has a biomechanical advantage of improving fusion rates. In posterior thoracolumbar immobilization, a large number of screws cause perforation to the pedicle or vertebral body. Radiography and computed tomography (CT) have been used to minimize this complication. The ability of ultrasound (US) to detect the pedicle breach during placement of the screw is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of US for detecting breaches.
METHODS: A B-type transducer was used to scan 216 titanium pins inserted into cadaveric pedicles. Of the pins, 180 were intentionally misplaced: 90 pins breached the lateral wall of the pedicle, and 90 pins pierced the anterior wall of the vertebral body. US images were reviewed by 3 examiners blinded to both the procedure and the corresponding CT findings. The perforation length of pins was measured by 3 radiologists on CT images.
RESULTS: CT data were divided into 2 groups. In group 1 (perforation length 0-2 mm), sensitivity of US for detecting lateral wall and anterior wall perforation was 80.95% and 76.42%, respectively; in group 2 (perforation length 2-4 mm), sensitivity was 94.79% and 91.93%. Overall sensitivity of US to detect lateral wall and anterior wall perforation was 89.63% and 86.30%, respectively. The sensitivity of US for detecting perforation was greater in the lateral wall than in the anterior wall. Sensitivity of US was greater in group 2 than group 1 for both lateral and anterior perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: US can be applied to detect perforation of ≤4 mm. Use of US may improve patient safety.
METHODS: A B-type transducer was used to scan 216 titanium pins inserted into cadaveric pedicles. Of the pins, 180 were intentionally misplaced: 90 pins breached the lateral wall of the pedicle, and 90 pins pierced the anterior wall of the vertebral body. US images were reviewed by 3 examiners blinded to both the procedure and the corresponding CT findings. The perforation length of pins was measured by 3 radiologists on CT images.
RESULTS: CT data were divided into 2 groups. In group 1 (perforation length 0-2 mm), sensitivity of US for detecting lateral wall and anterior wall perforation was 80.95% and 76.42%, respectively; in group 2 (perforation length 2-4 mm), sensitivity was 94.79% and 91.93%. Overall sensitivity of US to detect lateral wall and anterior wall perforation was 89.63% and 86.30%, respectively. The sensitivity of US for detecting perforation was greater in the lateral wall than in the anterior wall. Sensitivity of US was greater in group 2 than group 1 for both lateral and anterior perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: US can be applied to detect perforation of ≤4 mm. Use of US may improve patient safety.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app