We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evisceration with autogenous scleral graft and bioceramic implantation within the modified scleral shell: 133 cases over 17 years.
Orbit 2018 April 20
INTRODUCTION: To present long-term follow-up data on evisceration performed with autogenous scleral grafting and ceramic implantation in a modified scleral shell.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive eviscerations performed in the Department of Ophthalmology, Montpellier University Hospital, France, between February 1998 and October 2015. For all patients, the technique used was a conventional anterior evisceration after total keratectomy, disinsertion of the medial rectus muscle, sectioning of the optic nerve and excision of sclera centered on the papilla. The scleral graft was then sutured just behind the sutured keratectomy, and the bioceramic implant was inserted by posterior way in the scleral shell. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, cosmetic results from pictures of all patients and complications were recorded. This study was performed with Ethics Review Committee Approval, and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
RESULTS: In total, 133 patients (36.6% women) were identified during the study period. The mean (SD) implant size was 17.32 (1.84) mm. The median follow-up after evisceration was 57.43 (24.7, 68.3) months. Two cases of implant exposure (1.5%) were recorded. For 24 patients (17.9%), additional surgeries were performed for ptosis (2.2%), conjunctival cyst (1.5%), or post-evisceration socket syndrome (6.7%). Cosmetics results were excellent for 50.1% of cases, good for 33.3% and fair for 16.6%; using a grading scale based on the superior sulcus deformity.
CONCLUSION: Evisceration with autogenous scleral grafting and ceramic implantation can result in a high volume of restoration, good cosmetic results, and low risk of exposure of the implant.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive eviscerations performed in the Department of Ophthalmology, Montpellier University Hospital, France, between February 1998 and October 2015. For all patients, the technique used was a conventional anterior evisceration after total keratectomy, disinsertion of the medial rectus muscle, sectioning of the optic nerve and excision of sclera centered on the papilla. The scleral graft was then sutured just behind the sutured keratectomy, and the bioceramic implant was inserted by posterior way in the scleral shell. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, cosmetic results from pictures of all patients and complications were recorded. This study was performed with Ethics Review Committee Approval, and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
RESULTS: In total, 133 patients (36.6% women) were identified during the study period. The mean (SD) implant size was 17.32 (1.84) mm. The median follow-up after evisceration was 57.43 (24.7, 68.3) months. Two cases of implant exposure (1.5%) were recorded. For 24 patients (17.9%), additional surgeries were performed for ptosis (2.2%), conjunctival cyst (1.5%), or post-evisceration socket syndrome (6.7%). Cosmetics results were excellent for 50.1% of cases, good for 33.3% and fair for 16.6%; using a grading scale based on the superior sulcus deformity.
CONCLUSION: Evisceration with autogenous scleral grafting and ceramic implantation can result in a high volume of restoration, good cosmetic results, and low risk of exposure of the implant.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app