We have located links that may give you full text access.
Maternal blood endotoxin activity in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2018 April 27
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal blood endotoxin activity (EA) in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) with gestational age (GA) matched controls; to evaluate serial EA till birth in PPROM and its correlation with latency to delivery.
METHODS: We followed singleton preterm pregnancies from admission with PPROM until birth. Uncomplicated, GA-matched pregnancies served as controls. Demographics, birth and neonatal outcomes were collected. EA (EAA™) was assessed serially in PPROM and at study entry in controls. EA was compared using Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon tests, p value <.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: We recruited 20 cases of PPROM and 20 controls. Demographics were similar between groups. Mean GA of PPROM was 29.0 ± 2.2 weeks and median latency was 7.5 (IQR 14.1) weeks. Median EA at admission following PPROM was significantly elevated over controls (0.43 (0.18) versus 0.36 (0.2); p < .02). Overall there was no difference in median EA at admission and in labor (0.43 (0.18) versus 0.33 (0.21); p = .2) following PPROM. However, on comparing cases with latency to delivery ≤7 days (n = 10) versus >7 days (n = 10), there was a significant drop in EA in the latter group (0.44 (0.2) versus 0.34 (0.2); p < .004).
CONCLUSIONS: EA in PPROM represents a promising biomarker in predicting the clinical evolution of preterm birth.
METHODS: We followed singleton preterm pregnancies from admission with PPROM until birth. Uncomplicated, GA-matched pregnancies served as controls. Demographics, birth and neonatal outcomes were collected. EA (EAA™) was assessed serially in PPROM and at study entry in controls. EA was compared using Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon tests, p value <.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: We recruited 20 cases of PPROM and 20 controls. Demographics were similar between groups. Mean GA of PPROM was 29.0 ± 2.2 weeks and median latency was 7.5 (IQR 14.1) weeks. Median EA at admission following PPROM was significantly elevated over controls (0.43 (0.18) versus 0.36 (0.2); p < .02). Overall there was no difference in median EA at admission and in labor (0.43 (0.18) versus 0.33 (0.21); p = .2) following PPROM. However, on comparing cases with latency to delivery ≤7 days (n = 10) versus >7 days (n = 10), there was a significant drop in EA in the latter group (0.44 (0.2) versus 0.34 (0.2); p < .004).
CONCLUSIONS: EA in PPROM represents a promising biomarker in predicting the clinical evolution of preterm birth.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app