Interpreting carbapenem susceptibility testing results for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenems are among the most powerful antipseudomonal agents. Limited data is available on drug susceptibility testing by routine methods (disc diffusion and Etest) for meropenem and doripenem. We aimed to compare the in vitro activity of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS: A total of 311 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from respiratory specimens in 170 patients who developed ventilator-associated pneumonia in two intensive care units were collected over a period of 31 months. The susceptibility of these isolates to imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem were determined by Etest and disc diffusion method.

RESULTS: Considering either all isolates or only the first isolates recovered per patient (311 and 170 respectively), the susceptibility rate for doripenem was higher than that for meropenem and imipenem. When MICs determined by Etest were converted into interpretative categories (S, I, R) using French (CA-SFM) guidelines, a poor correlation was observed for meropenem and doripenem. The percentages of correlation with the disc diffusion method were 90.6% and 89.7% for imipenem, 80.5% and 82.6% for meropenem, and 80.5% and 73.3% for doripenem, for the first isolates and all isolates, respectively. The rate of minor errors was as high as 17.7% and 16.1% for meropenem and 17.7% and 25.7% for doripenem for the first isolates and all isolates, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The accuracy of disc diffusion using CA-SFM guidelines appears unsatisfactory for all three carbapenems justifying guideline update for P. aeruginosa and carbapenems.