Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Myoglobin: still a useful biomarker in 2017?

The clinical biologist plays a role as a consultant for the relevant use of biological examination. Advisory activities of the medical laboratory may help physician in diagnosis or therapeutic algorithm, avoiding redundant ordering or useless tests. In this context, we performed a review of literature about the clinically interest of myoglobin assays. The indications of myoglobin's assays appear fairly limited. It is no longer mentioned in the European guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. In patients with rhabdomyolysis myoglobin is neither a diagnostic nor a prognostic criterion. Its interest in predicting the occurrence of acute renal failure is also discussed. The most recent clinico-biological score (such as the McMahon score) do not integrate it. In this context, we decided to stop performing myoglobin assay.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app