Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Association Between Breastfeeding and Childhood Breathing Patterns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association between breastfeeding and breathing patterns in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for publications from inception to October 1, 2017. The breastfeeding duration and period of exclusive breastfeeding were selected as primary outcomes. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence. The Newcastle-Ottawa Score was used for quality and comparability assessment.

RESULTS: Of the 54 articles identified, three observational studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, representing 1,046 participants. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence rate of mouth breathing (OR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.26-3.31; p = 0.004) was significantly higher in subjects who were breastfed for less than 6 months, but no significant difference was observed within the periods of exclusive breastfeeding (6 months or less) (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.73-2.21; p = 0.40).

CONCLUSION: We found only limited evidence about the association between breastfeeding and breathing patterns. However, the current evidence supports the association between breastfeeding and childhood breathing patterns. Based on this review, we found that the frequency of normal nasal respiration increases with the duration of breastfeeding. The methodological quality of the studies included was moderate. Thus, future studies should aim to correct the confounding factors related to breathing patterns, to use standardized diagnostic criteria of mouth breathing, and to conduct a prospective research to reduce the recall bias.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app