JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Microsurgical Clipping of Basilar Apex Aneurysms: A Systematic Historical Review of Approaches and their Results.

OBJECTIVE: Neck clipping remains a valuable treatment option for basilar apex aneurysms, especially in those with complex morphology, such as incorporation of branching vessels or large size, and young patient age. Several approaches have proved to give effective exposure for various types of lesion morphologies. Our historic literature review from 1976 to the present systematically compares the outcomes and complications of the key surgical approaches in the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms.

METHODS: We searched PubMed for articles with at least 5 patients, data on neurologic outcome, and procedure-associated complications for the following approaches: pterional or orbitozygomatic transsylvian, subtemporal (with or without zygomatic osteotomy), pretemporal (with or without transcavernous extension), and transpetrous. n-Weighted averages for clinical outcome, aneurysm occlusion rates, morbidity, mortality, and aneurysm morphology were compared.

RESULTS: Of 35 articles selected, 2041 patients with 722 ruptured aneurysms underwent microsurgery, including 1131 transsylvian, 241 pretemporal, 375 subtemporal, and 17 transpetrous approaches. Comparing these 4 approaches in n-weighted averages, respectively, we noted good neurologic outcomes (81%, 85%, 81%, and 58%), surgical morbidity (14%, 10%, 34%, and 53%), surgical mortality (4%, 1%, 0, and 1%), and complete occlusion rates (95%, 94%, 86%, and 75%).

CONCLUSIONS: Transsylvian, pretemporal, and subtemporal approaches showed favorable neurologic outcomes at similar rates and were applied for aneurysms located between -1mm and +7mm in relation to the posterior clinoid process. The pretemporal approach was preferably applied to large and giant aneurysms with good outcome; the transsylvian approach was most frequently used for ruptured aneurysms.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app