We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease without dialysis: a meta-analysis.
International Urology and Nephrology 2018 August
PURPOSE: Recent epidemiological evidence attempts to demonstrate the risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) without dialysis, but prevalence estimates of PH in CKD without dialysis vary widely in the existing studies. This meta-analysis was to summarize the point prevalence of PH in adults with CKD without dialysis.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched to identify eligible studies. We used a random-effect meta-analysis model to estimate the prevalence of PH. Associations were tested in subgroups and meta-regression analyses. We also performed sensitivity analyses and assessments of publishing bias.
RESULTS: Twenty-one observational studies (n = 8012 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The result of analysis in random-effect model showed that the pooled prevalence was 32% (95% CI 23-42%), with significant heterogeneity between these studies (I2 = 98%, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses found that the study design, region, sample size, year of publication, and definition of PH based on PASP ≥ 35 mmHg may explain the variation between studies. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated the results to be robust. There was no evidence of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: PH is highly prevalent in patients with CKD without dialysis. Owing to the high heterogeneity, future well-designed and large prospective studies are encouraged to confirm the findings and definitively clarify the potential biological mechanisms.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched to identify eligible studies. We used a random-effect meta-analysis model to estimate the prevalence of PH. Associations were tested in subgroups and meta-regression analyses. We also performed sensitivity analyses and assessments of publishing bias.
RESULTS: Twenty-one observational studies (n = 8012 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The result of analysis in random-effect model showed that the pooled prevalence was 32% (95% CI 23-42%), with significant heterogeneity between these studies (I2 = 98%, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses found that the study design, region, sample size, year of publication, and definition of PH based on PASP ≥ 35 mmHg may explain the variation between studies. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated the results to be robust. There was no evidence of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: PH is highly prevalent in patients with CKD without dialysis. Owing to the high heterogeneity, future well-designed and large prospective studies are encouraged to confirm the findings and definitively clarify the potential biological mechanisms.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app