We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
European Journal of Radiology 2018 April
PURPOSE: Recently, ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) with a 0.25 mm × 128-row detector was introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using U-HRCT.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 38 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with U-HRCT followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Per-segment diameter stenosis was calculated. Diagnostic performance of CCTA relative to ICA as the reference standard was determined. For segments with >30% diameter stenosis, the correlation and agreement of percent diameter stenosis between CCTA and ICA were calculated.
RESULTS: Obstructive CAD was observed in 65 segments (12%) of 51 vessels (45%) in 32 patients (84%) during ICA. The per-patient, vessel, and segment analyses showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%-100%), 96% (95% CI: 89%-99%) and 95% (95% CI: 89%-98%), respectively, and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 38%-67%), 81% (95% CI: 75%-83%) and 96% (95% CI: 96%-97%), respectively. The percentage of diameter stenosis, as determined by CCTA, demonstrated an excellent correlation with ICA (R = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95) and a slight significant overestimation (mean: 4% ± 7%, p < .01), with the agreed range of limits being ± 16%. The median effective radiation dose for CCTA was 5.4 mSv (range: 2.9-18.0 mSv).
CONCLUSIONS: CCTA with U-HRCT demonstrated an excellent correlation and agreement with ICA in the quantification of coronary artery stenosis.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 38 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with U-HRCT followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Per-segment diameter stenosis was calculated. Diagnostic performance of CCTA relative to ICA as the reference standard was determined. For segments with >30% diameter stenosis, the correlation and agreement of percent diameter stenosis between CCTA and ICA were calculated.
RESULTS: Obstructive CAD was observed in 65 segments (12%) of 51 vessels (45%) in 32 patients (84%) during ICA. The per-patient, vessel, and segment analyses showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%-100%), 96% (95% CI: 89%-99%) and 95% (95% CI: 89%-98%), respectively, and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 38%-67%), 81% (95% CI: 75%-83%) and 96% (95% CI: 96%-97%), respectively. The percentage of diameter stenosis, as determined by CCTA, demonstrated an excellent correlation with ICA (R = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95) and a slight significant overestimation (mean: 4% ± 7%, p < .01), with the agreed range of limits being ± 16%. The median effective radiation dose for CCTA was 5.4 mSv (range: 2.9-18.0 mSv).
CONCLUSIONS: CCTA with U-HRCT demonstrated an excellent correlation and agreement with ICA in the quantification of coronary artery stenosis.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app