Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Lack of correlation between gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and esophageal lesions after sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The postoperative development or worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) represents the major drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). A GERD diagnosis is often based only on symptoms and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) intake, while objective tests like esophagogastroduodenoscopy and pH measurements are performed less frequently.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between reflux symptoms and GERD-related esophageal lesions.

SETTINGS: University hospital, Rome, Italy.

METHODS: A comprehensive clinical control entailing GERD symptoms, PPI intake, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was proposed to all patients who underwent SG between June 2007 and February 2011, irrespective of the presence of GERD symptoms. One hundred forty-four of 219 patients agreed to take part in the study (follow-up rate: 65.8%).

RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 66 months, GERD symptoms and PPI intake were recorded in 70.2% and 63.9% of patients, respectively. Mean visual analogue scale score was 2.9 ± 3.3. The overall frequency of erosive esophagitis was 59.8%, while nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus was detected in 13.1%. The frequency of esophageal biliary reflux was 68%. GERD symptoms and visual analogue scale score were not significantly associated with the development of erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus and the severity of the esophageal lesions. Moreover, the frequency of erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in patients consuming PPI were similar to that of patients without PPI.

CONCLUSION: Symptoms investigation alone is not a reliable tool to diagnose GERD after SG. The use of objective diagnostic tests, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy, should be carefully considered in the postoperative follow-up schedule of SG patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app