We have located links that may give you full text access.
Assessment of clinical and pathological features of patients who underwent thyroid surgery: A retrospective clinical study.
World Journal of Clinical Cases 2018 March 17
AIM: To evaluate whether there was any correlation between the clinical parameters and final pathological results among patients who underwent thyroid surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed parameters, including age, sex, complete blood cell count parameters, nodule diameter, nodule localization, thyroid function testing, and pathology reports, in patients who underwent thyroid surgery. The patients were divided into malignant ( n = 92) and benign ( n = 413) groups depending on the final pathological results. Both groups were compared for demographic and clinical parameters. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was used to determine if the quantitative variables had a normal distribution. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare quantitative data that were not normally distributed, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare the qualitative data. The correlation between the final pathological results and fine-needle aspiration biopsy findings was calculated using the cross-tabulation method.
RESULTS: This study included 406 women and 99 men aged between 15 and 85 years. No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to age, sex, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, thrombocyte count, red cell distribution width, platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, platecrit, nodule localization, and thyroid function testing. On the other hand, there were significant differences between the groups with respect to nodule size ( P = 0.001), cervical lymphadenopathy ( P = 0.0001) and nodular calcification ( P = 0.0001). Compared with the malignant group, the benign group had a significantly greater nodule size (35.4 mm vs 27.6 mm). The best cut-off point (≤ 28 mm) for nodule size, as determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve, had a sensitivity and specificity of 67.7% and 64.4%, respectively. The correlation between fine-needle aspiration biopsy and the final pathological results was assessed using the cross-table method. The sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration biopsy were 60% and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that significant differences existed between the malignant and benign groups with regard to nodule size, cervical lymphadenopathy, and nodular calcification.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed parameters, including age, sex, complete blood cell count parameters, nodule diameter, nodule localization, thyroid function testing, and pathology reports, in patients who underwent thyroid surgery. The patients were divided into malignant ( n = 92) and benign ( n = 413) groups depending on the final pathological results. Both groups were compared for demographic and clinical parameters. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was used to determine if the quantitative variables had a normal distribution. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare quantitative data that were not normally distributed, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare the qualitative data. The correlation between the final pathological results and fine-needle aspiration biopsy findings was calculated using the cross-tabulation method.
RESULTS: This study included 406 women and 99 men aged between 15 and 85 years. No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to age, sex, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, thrombocyte count, red cell distribution width, platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, platecrit, nodule localization, and thyroid function testing. On the other hand, there were significant differences between the groups with respect to nodule size ( P = 0.001), cervical lymphadenopathy ( P = 0.0001) and nodular calcification ( P = 0.0001). Compared with the malignant group, the benign group had a significantly greater nodule size (35.4 mm vs 27.6 mm). The best cut-off point (≤ 28 mm) for nodule size, as determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve, had a sensitivity and specificity of 67.7% and 64.4%, respectively. The correlation between fine-needle aspiration biopsy and the final pathological results was assessed using the cross-table method. The sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration biopsy were 60% and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that significant differences existed between the malignant and benign groups with regard to nodule size, cervical lymphadenopathy, and nodular calcification.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app