Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The concentration of console surgeons: prospective evaluation of the loss of attention in robotic-assisted procedures.

To prospectively evaluate the possible loss of attention among console surgeons performing robotic-assisted procedures using a validated psychological test. The concentration of one console surgeon was assessed before and after 25 robotic-assisted procedures (radical prostatectomies) using the validated d2 attention test (computer-assisted, Hogrefe test systems, Germany). Error frequency, work rate, and accuracy of task performance were evaluated as parameters of the fluctuation in concentration. Data were correlated with clinical parameters, including console times, positive surgical margin rates and the use of a nerve-sparing procedure. Pre- and post-operative test results revealed no differences in the number of items performed, but a significant decline in the error-corrected performance between the pre- and post-operative tests was observed with increasing console time (p = 0.046; median console time 123 min.). No differences in the pre-operative tests for consecutive procedures (mean time between procedures 93 min.) were found, whereas the number of errors (missed items) increased in the post-operative tests (p = 0.0025). The measured differences in test results showed no association with the positive surgical margin rate. A planned nerve-sparing procedure tended to result in a lower level of concentration found in pre-operative testing (p = 0.07). Concentration decrease and loss of attention during robotic-assisted procedures can be measured validly using the d2 attention test. Longer console times lead to loss of attention but consecutive procedures do not decrease the test or surgical performance. Further studies need to address whether similar effects apply to the comparable open or other robotic procedures or to different levels of surgeons experience.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app