Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of the Carbapenem Detection Set™ for the detection and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of the Carbapenemase Detection Set™ (CDS; Mast Diagnostics) in association with i) the EUCAST meropenem screening cut-off and ii) the faropenem-temocillin algorithm (FTa) for the screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). A total of 200 well-characterized enterobacterial isolates with reduced susceptibility to at least one carbapenem including 63 non-CPEs and 137 CPEs belonging to different Ambler classes were initially screened for CPEs using i) the EUCAST meropenem cut-off (diameter <25 mm) and ii) the FTa. Highly suspected CPEs underwent further testing using the CDS, which is based on the inhibition zone diameters determination of combined disks (A: meropenem, B: meropenem + dipicolinic acid, C: meropenem + cloxacillin, and D: meropenem + boronic acid). With the FTa, 66.7% of the non-CPE isolates were correctly identified. Most OXA-48-like producers (90.5%) were detected with 98.6% specificity. The FTa discriminates CPE from non-CPE with 100% sensitivity, but complementary tests were still needed for 59 % (118/200) of the strains. The EUCAST cut-off led to 3 false-negative results (2 OXA-181 and 1 NMC-A producer) resulting in a sensitivity of 97.8% for the discrimination between CPE and non-CPE, and 75.5% (151/200) of the strains still required complementary test. The CDS reduced the number of isolates requiring additional tests from 59% to 22%, and from 75.5% to 38% for FTa and EUCAST cut-off, respectively. FTa possesses very good specificities for the detection and classification of Ambler class A and most class B carbapenemase-producers, except for IMP producers, which were almost not detected (10/11). In conclusion, the association of the CDS with the FTa presented only 22% of inconclusive results, while this number was 38% with the EUCAST meropenem CPE screening cut-off.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app