COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer coatings have shown promising outcomes in randomised studies.

METHODS: We compared neointimal healing patterns including strut coverage and assessed neointimal maturity using a novel algorithm in coronary lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer coating (BP-SES) or everolimus eluting stents with permanent polymer coating (PP-EES) using optical coherence tomography after 6months.

RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were randomised to BP-SES (n=19) or PP-EES (n=20) for the treatment of coronary lesions. Of those, 29 patients (14 BP-SES and 15 PP-EES) underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography at 6-month follow-up. Tissue coverage and apposition were assessed in a total of 6162 struts (BP-SES, n=2889; PP-EES, n=3273). Neointimal maturity was assessed in 3672 neointimal regions above struts using grey scale intensity analysis. OCT analysis showed neointimal coverage of 2433 (BP-SES) vs. 2702 (PP-EES) struts (84.2% vs. 82.6%, p=0.70), whereas the remainder was uncovered after 6months. Mean neointimal thickness did not differ significantly between groups (54.3±7.8μm vs. 80±14.6μm, p=0.12). The rate of malapposed struts was comparable between groups (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p=0.27). Grey scale signal intensity analysis showed mature tissue coverage of struts in 46.2% in BP-SES vs. 31.8% in PP-EES (p=0.31) of neointimal regions.

CONCLUSION: The present study showed comparable early vascular healing response characterised by neointimal coverage with mainly immature neointima in both BP-SES and PP-EES.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app