We have located links that may give you full text access.
Numerical algorithms for scatter-to-attenuation reconstruction in PET: empirical comparison of convergence, acceleration, and the effect of subsets.
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences 2017 September
The use of scattered coincidences for attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) data has recently been proposed. For practical applications, convergence speeds require further improvement, yet there exists a trade-off between convergence speed and the risk of non-convergence. In this respect, a maximum-likelihood gradient-ascent (MLGA) algorithm and a two-branch back-projection (2BP), which was previously proposed, were evaluated.
Methods: MLGA was combined with the Armijo step size rule; and accelerated using conjugate gradients, Nesterov's momentum method, and data subsets of different sizes. In 2BP, we varied the subset size, an important determinant of convergence speed and computational burden. We used three sets of simulation data to evaluate the impact of a spatial scale factor.
Results and discussion: The Armijo step size allowed 10-fold increased step sizes compared to native MLGA. Conjugate gradients and Nesterov momentum lead to slightly faster, yet non-uniform convergence; improvements were mostly confined to later iterations, possibly due to the non-linearity of the problem. MLGA with data subsets achieved faster, uniform, and predictable convergence, with a speed-up factor equivalent to the number of subsets and no increase in computational burden. By contrast, 2BP computational burden increased linearly with the number of subsets due to repeated evaluation of the objective function, and convergence was limited to the case of many (and therefore small) subsets, which resulted in high computational burden.
Conclusion: Possibilities of improving 2BP appear limited. While general-purpose acceleration methods appear insufficient for MLGA, results suggest that data subsets are a promising way of improving MLGA performance.
Methods: MLGA was combined with the Armijo step size rule; and accelerated using conjugate gradients, Nesterov's momentum method, and data subsets of different sizes. In 2BP, we varied the subset size, an important determinant of convergence speed and computational burden. We used three sets of simulation data to evaluate the impact of a spatial scale factor.
Results and discussion: The Armijo step size allowed 10-fold increased step sizes compared to native MLGA. Conjugate gradients and Nesterov momentum lead to slightly faster, yet non-uniform convergence; improvements were mostly confined to later iterations, possibly due to the non-linearity of the problem. MLGA with data subsets achieved faster, uniform, and predictable convergence, with a speed-up factor equivalent to the number of subsets and no increase in computational burden. By contrast, 2BP computational burden increased linearly with the number of subsets due to repeated evaluation of the objective function, and convergence was limited to the case of many (and therefore small) subsets, which resulted in high computational burden.
Conclusion: Possibilities of improving 2BP appear limited. While general-purpose acceleration methods appear insufficient for MLGA, results suggest that data subsets are a promising way of improving MLGA performance.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app