We have located links that may give you full text access.
Risk factors associated with post-loading implant loss of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 July
PURPOSE: This study analyzed risk factors for post-loading implant loss in cases of implant-supported prostheses applied to edentulous jaws of Japanese patients.
METHODS: In total, 245 dental implant fixtures placed in 54 edentulous jaws of 46 patients performed at Niigata University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the cumulative survival rate (SR) of implants, and multiple Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors of implant loss. The following risk factors for implant failure were examined: age, sex, survival time, implant length, implant location, smoking habit, bone density, bone augmentation, opposing dentition, loading period, and type of final restoration. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to examine difference in survival curves of the extracted predictors.
RESULTS: Sixteen implants failed during the observation period (SR=92.8 %). Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex [hazard ratio (HR)=16.1; p=0.007] and use of maxillary removable restorations (HR=12.7; p<0.000) were risk factors for implant failure. Other factors had no significant effect on implant failure. The SR of implants for males (SR=86.9%) was significantly lower than that for females (SR=99.1%). The SR of implants for maxillary removable restorations (SR=76.4%) was significantly lower than for maxillary fixed restorations (SR=99.1%) and mandibular fixed restorations (SR=97.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary implants with removable restorations and male sex were risk factors for implant failure among Japanese edentulous patients.
METHODS: In total, 245 dental implant fixtures placed in 54 edentulous jaws of 46 patients performed at Niigata University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the cumulative survival rate (SR) of implants, and multiple Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors of implant loss. The following risk factors for implant failure were examined: age, sex, survival time, implant length, implant location, smoking habit, bone density, bone augmentation, opposing dentition, loading period, and type of final restoration. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to examine difference in survival curves of the extracted predictors.
RESULTS: Sixteen implants failed during the observation period (SR=92.8 %). Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex [hazard ratio (HR)=16.1; p=0.007] and use of maxillary removable restorations (HR=12.7; p<0.000) were risk factors for implant failure. Other factors had no significant effect on implant failure. The SR of implants for males (SR=86.9%) was significantly lower than that for females (SR=99.1%). The SR of implants for maxillary removable restorations (SR=76.4%) was significantly lower than for maxillary fixed restorations (SR=99.1%) and mandibular fixed restorations (SR=97.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary implants with removable restorations and male sex were risk factors for implant failure among Japanese edentulous patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app