We have located links that may give you full text access.
CT features differentiating pre- and minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma appearing as mixed ground-glass nodules: mass is a potential imaging biomarker.
Clinical Radiology 2018 June
AIM: To investigate the differential diagnosis value of preoperative computed tomography (CT) features between pre/minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in pulmonary mixed ground glass nodules (mGGNs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The histopathological data and CT images of 146 mGGNs in 141 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the CT features differentiating between pre/minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma and to evaluate their accuracy.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, there were significant differences (p<0.05) in the nodule diameter, volume, density, mass, solid portion volume, shape, margin, air bronchogram, and pleural retraction between pre/minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that nodule mass and volume were statistically significant independent differentiators. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the differentiators. According to the corresponding ROC curve, the optimal cut-off mass to differentiate pre/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma was 254.87 mg, with a sensitivity of 84.52%, a specificity of 88.71%, and an accuracy of 86.30%. Compared with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for mass, volume, and diameter, the differential diagnosis value of mass was higher than those of volume and diameter.
CONCLUSION: Nodule mass and volume were significant differentiators of pre/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma in mGGN, and mass had a higher differential diagnosis value.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The histopathological data and CT images of 146 mGGNs in 141 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the CT features differentiating between pre/minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma and to evaluate their accuracy.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, there were significant differences (p<0.05) in the nodule diameter, volume, density, mass, solid portion volume, shape, margin, air bronchogram, and pleural retraction between pre/minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that nodule mass and volume were statistically significant independent differentiators. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the differentiators. According to the corresponding ROC curve, the optimal cut-off mass to differentiate pre/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma was 254.87 mg, with a sensitivity of 84.52%, a specificity of 88.71%, and an accuracy of 86.30%. Compared with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for mass, volume, and diameter, the differential diagnosis value of mass was higher than those of volume and diameter.
CONCLUSION: Nodule mass and volume were significant differentiators of pre/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma in mGGN, and mass had a higher differential diagnosis value.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app