We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Previous Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft.
Cornea 2018 June
PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with previous Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
METHODS: This retrospective interventional case series included 26 eyes (26 patients) that underwent DMEK to replace a previous DSAEK graft with at least 6 months of follow-up. The outcome measures were indications for surgery, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density, rebubbling rate, rejection, and failure.
RESULTS: Patient age was 71.9 ± 12.6 years. The average follow-up time after DMEK was 15.1 ± 10.6 months. Indications for DMEK were DSAEK graft failure (69%) and a DSAEK suboptimal visual outcome (31%). BSCVA of the entire cohort (n = 26) improved from 1.33 ± 0.78 logMAR preoperatively to 1.04 ± 0.78 and 1.06 ± 0.89 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up, respectively (P = 0.019 and P = 0.033). BSCVA among eyes without visual comorbidities (n = 13) improved from 0.84 ± 0.50 logMAR preoperatively to 0.55 ± 0.47 and 0.51 ± 0.49 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at final follow-up, respectively (P = 0.023 for both). Of these eyes, 84.6% had improvement in BSCVA at 6 months postoperatively and at last follow-up. In the subgroup of 8 eyes with DMEK for suboptimal visual outcomes after DSAEK, BSCVA improved from 0.81 ± 0.44 to 0.52 ± 0.35 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.024). When excluding eyes with visual comorbidities, BSCVA of this subgroup (n = 5) improved from 0.54 ± 0.32 to 0.36 ± 0.25 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.038). BSCVA of this subgroup at 6 months postoperatively was not significantly different from preoperative BSCVA, when including visual comorbidities (n = 8, 0.75 ± 0.60 logMAR, P = 0.79) and when excluding visual comorbidities (n = 5, 0.40 ± 0.28 logMAR, P = 0.621). Endothelial cell density decreased from 2753 ± 307 cells/mm to 1659 ± 655 cells/mm 6 months after surgery (39.7% loss, P = 0.005). Three eyes (11.5%) required rebubbling, and 5 eyes (19.2%) had secondary graft failure at 2 to 20 months.
CONCLUSIONS: DMEK is effective for replacing previous DSAEK not only for graft failure but also for suboptimal visual outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective interventional case series included 26 eyes (26 patients) that underwent DMEK to replace a previous DSAEK graft with at least 6 months of follow-up. The outcome measures were indications for surgery, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density, rebubbling rate, rejection, and failure.
RESULTS: Patient age was 71.9 ± 12.6 years. The average follow-up time after DMEK was 15.1 ± 10.6 months. Indications for DMEK were DSAEK graft failure (69%) and a DSAEK suboptimal visual outcome (31%). BSCVA of the entire cohort (n = 26) improved from 1.33 ± 0.78 logMAR preoperatively to 1.04 ± 0.78 and 1.06 ± 0.89 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up, respectively (P = 0.019 and P = 0.033). BSCVA among eyes without visual comorbidities (n = 13) improved from 0.84 ± 0.50 logMAR preoperatively to 0.55 ± 0.47 and 0.51 ± 0.49 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at final follow-up, respectively (P = 0.023 for both). Of these eyes, 84.6% had improvement in BSCVA at 6 months postoperatively and at last follow-up. In the subgroup of 8 eyes with DMEK for suboptimal visual outcomes after DSAEK, BSCVA improved from 0.81 ± 0.44 to 0.52 ± 0.35 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.024). When excluding eyes with visual comorbidities, BSCVA of this subgroup (n = 5) improved from 0.54 ± 0.32 to 0.36 ± 0.25 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.038). BSCVA of this subgroup at 6 months postoperatively was not significantly different from preoperative BSCVA, when including visual comorbidities (n = 8, 0.75 ± 0.60 logMAR, P = 0.79) and when excluding visual comorbidities (n = 5, 0.40 ± 0.28 logMAR, P = 0.621). Endothelial cell density decreased from 2753 ± 307 cells/mm to 1659 ± 655 cells/mm 6 months after surgery (39.7% loss, P = 0.005). Three eyes (11.5%) required rebubbling, and 5 eyes (19.2%) had secondary graft failure at 2 to 20 months.
CONCLUSIONS: DMEK is effective for replacing previous DSAEK not only for graft failure but also for suboptimal visual outcomes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app