We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
Infection 2018 August
AIMS: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is one of the most common serious bacterial infections worldwide. It represents a heterogenous clinical entity with a high risk of metastatic complications and a high in-hospital mortality ranging between 20 and 30%. The outcome can be improved by optimised diagnostic and therapeutic management. Thus, our minireview should provide important and often missed pieces of information in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
METHODS: We describe the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
RESULTS: Five essentials were identified: 1) S. aureus bacteremia should always be considered clinically significant. 2) Length of bacteremia and fever is relevant for diagnostic workup, duration of therapy and prognosis. 3) Prompt identification and eradication of portal of entry and infective/metastatic foci are essential. 4) Infective endocarditis should be excluded. 5) Intravenous treatment for at least two weeks up to 4-6 weeks with antistaphylococcal penicillins for MSSA and vancomycin or daptomycin for MRSA bloodstream infection is indicated.
CONCLUSION: Further efforts should be undertaken to increase the adherence to the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
METHODS: We describe the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
RESULTS: Five essentials were identified: 1) S. aureus bacteremia should always be considered clinically significant. 2) Length of bacteremia and fever is relevant for diagnostic workup, duration of therapy and prognosis. 3) Prompt identification and eradication of portal of entry and infective/metastatic foci are essential. 4) Infective endocarditis should be excluded. 5) Intravenous treatment for at least two weeks up to 4-6 weeks with antistaphylococcal penicillins for MSSA and vancomycin or daptomycin for MRSA bloodstream infection is indicated.
CONCLUSION: Further efforts should be undertaken to increase the adherence to the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app