We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
A novel ocular delivery of brinzolamide based on gellan gum: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Background: The aim of the study was to develop a sustained ocular delivery of brinzolamide (BLZ) based on gellan gum.
Methods: The formulations were characterized for clarity, gelling capacity, rheological studies, pH, drug content, and in vitro drug-release behavior. In vivo rabbit eye irritation test was conducted to evaluate irritation of the BLZ gel drug-delivery system. The prepared BLZ formulations were then investigated in vivo and compared with commercially available BLZ eyedrops with regard to pharmacodynamics.
Results: The results showed that the optimum concentration of gellan gum was 0.25% w/v; the prepared liquid was converted into a flowing gel after the addition of simulated tear fluid. In vitro release profiles showed that the release of BLZ from the in situ gel exhibited sustained characteristics. Draize test results showed that BLZ in situ gels did not stimulate signs of eye tissue activity and were less irritating than BLZ solutions and commercial Azopt.
Conclusion: The results of pharmacodynamics implied that the novel preparation of BLZ in situ gel effectively prolonged the intraocular pressure-lowering effect after administration.
Methods: The formulations were characterized for clarity, gelling capacity, rheological studies, pH, drug content, and in vitro drug-release behavior. In vivo rabbit eye irritation test was conducted to evaluate irritation of the BLZ gel drug-delivery system. The prepared BLZ formulations were then investigated in vivo and compared with commercially available BLZ eyedrops with regard to pharmacodynamics.
Results: The results showed that the optimum concentration of gellan gum was 0.25% w/v; the prepared liquid was converted into a flowing gel after the addition of simulated tear fluid. In vitro release profiles showed that the release of BLZ from the in situ gel exhibited sustained characteristics. Draize test results showed that BLZ in situ gels did not stimulate signs of eye tissue activity and were less irritating than BLZ solutions and commercial Azopt.
Conclusion: The results of pharmacodynamics implied that the novel preparation of BLZ in situ gel effectively prolonged the intraocular pressure-lowering effect after administration.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app