We have located links that may give you full text access.
Experience with peritoneal thermal injury during subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation for pediatric inguinal hernia.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2018 May
BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous endoscopically-assisted ligation (SEAL) for pediatric inguinal hernia repair has gained in popularity although variations in techniques exist. Peritoneal scarring by thermal injury has been described as an adjunct. We explored the hypothesized inverse-correlation between peritoneal scarring and recurrence after SEAL.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all patients <18years old undergoing SEAL between 2010 and 2016 (REB-20172727). Demographics and outcomes were investigated. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between peritoneal scarring and recurrence.
RESULTS: We identified 272 patients. Median age was 3years, 35% were female, and 19% were born premature. Median follow-up was 30months, ≥1 visit/patient. Bilaterality was noted in 35%. There were no reported cases of metachronous hernia, vas injury, testicular atrophy or chronic pain, and recurrence rate was 4.6%. Prematurity, unilateral repair, incarceration, and suture-type (Ti-Cron® vs. Ethibond®) had significant correlation with recurrence on univariate analysis (p<0.25). Surgeon experience did not. Peritoneal scarring, performed in 195 cases (72%), was not predictive of recurrence (adjusted OR=0.87, p=0.830) on multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: The rate of complications with SEAL compares favorably to published data. Thermal injury was not associated with improved recurrence rates. The benefits of peritoneal scarring may not outweigh the risks.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III - Retrospective Case-Control Study.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all patients <18years old undergoing SEAL between 2010 and 2016 (REB-20172727). Demographics and outcomes were investigated. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between peritoneal scarring and recurrence.
RESULTS: We identified 272 patients. Median age was 3years, 35% were female, and 19% were born premature. Median follow-up was 30months, ≥1 visit/patient. Bilaterality was noted in 35%. There were no reported cases of metachronous hernia, vas injury, testicular atrophy or chronic pain, and recurrence rate was 4.6%. Prematurity, unilateral repair, incarceration, and suture-type (Ti-Cron® vs. Ethibond®) had significant correlation with recurrence on univariate analysis (p<0.25). Surgeon experience did not. Peritoneal scarring, performed in 195 cases (72%), was not predictive of recurrence (adjusted OR=0.87, p=0.830) on multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: The rate of complications with SEAL compares favorably to published data. Thermal injury was not associated with improved recurrence rates. The benefits of peritoneal scarring may not outweigh the risks.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III - Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app