Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effectiveness of an Antigen-Specific Streptococcus mutans Chairside Test as Compared to a Culture-Based S. mutans Test.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of an antigen-specific Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) chairside test to a culture based S. mutans test. Methods: Fifty-three patients receiving dental hygiene care at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry were enrolled in the study. Stimulated saliva was collected from the patients and utilized for both bacteria tests. The antigen-specific test was compared to the culture-based bacteria test and to a caries risk assessment measuring sensitivity and specificity. Results: The majority of participants were male (53%) with high caries risk (60%). The culture based test results were primarily negative (62%); while the antigen-specific test had more positives (76%). The sensitivity and specificity comparing the antigen-specific test to the culture based test was high (88%, 95% CI = (78%, 97%) and low (25%, 95% CI = (13%, 37%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity comparing the antigen-specific test to caries risk was high (83%, 95% CI = (72%, 93%) and low (38%, 95% CI = (24%, 51%) respectively. Conclusions: While the sensitivity of the antigen-specific test was high for both the culture-based test and caries risk, the specificity was low for both. These results suggest that the antigen-specific test tends to give a higher proportion of false positive results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app