We have located links that may give you full text access.
How to adapt first trimester ultrasound education to Tunisian trainees.
La Tunisie Médicale 2017 April
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a targeted training program on the quality of NT measures performed by OBST/GYN trainees.
METHODS: Prospective study. Step1: each trainee achieved 10 T1US . All were evaluated by 2 experts. Step 2: interactive training session where participants received a detailed feedback report. Step3: each candidate performed again 10 T1US. The results obtained before and after the training session were compared.
RESULTS: Step1: Herman score was 4.1 with 38% of unacceptable exams. There was no correlation between the score and the level of the training curriculum. Main difficulty was about obtaining sagittal plane. Step2: self-assigned score before the session overestimated image quality (4.5 Vs. 4.1, p=0.03). At the end of the session, It decreased to 3.1. Step3: a significant improvement of technical settings, mean score (5.4 Vs. 4.1; p <0.001) , percentage of acceptable images (85% Vs. 62%, p = 0.002) and sagittal plane (6.4% Vs. 2.9%; p = 0.003). Only 37% had significantly improved their scores.
CONCLUSION: The training program evaluated in this study guides the trainee in his daily self-evaluation. This preliminary study can already open discussion on the education and quality control of the T1US in our country.
METHODS: Prospective study. Step1: each trainee achieved 10 T1US . All were evaluated by 2 experts. Step 2: interactive training session where participants received a detailed feedback report. Step3: each candidate performed again 10 T1US. The results obtained before and after the training session were compared.
RESULTS: Step1: Herman score was 4.1 with 38% of unacceptable exams. There was no correlation between the score and the level of the training curriculum. Main difficulty was about obtaining sagittal plane. Step2: self-assigned score before the session overestimated image quality (4.5 Vs. 4.1, p=0.03). At the end of the session, It decreased to 3.1. Step3: a significant improvement of technical settings, mean score (5.4 Vs. 4.1; p <0.001) , percentage of acceptable images (85% Vs. 62%, p = 0.002) and sagittal plane (6.4% Vs. 2.9%; p = 0.003). Only 37% had significantly improved their scores.
CONCLUSION: The training program evaluated in this study guides the trainee in his daily self-evaluation. This preliminary study can already open discussion on the education and quality control of the T1US in our country.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app