We have located links that may give you full text access.
The placental component and neonatal outcome in singleton vs. twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.
Placenta 2018 March
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare placental histopathological lesions and neonatal outcome in singleton vs. twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
METHODS: Maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, and placental histopathology reports of pregnancies complicated by GDM, between 1/2008-10/2016, were reviewed. Results were compared between singletons (singleton group) and dichorionic-diamniotic twins (twin group). Placental lesions were classified as placental weight abnormalities, maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion lesions (MVM, FVM), inflammatory lesions, and lesions associated with chronic villitis. LGA was defined as birth-weight ≥90th percentile. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as one or more early neonatal complications.
RESULTS: Compared with the twin group (n = 57), the singleton group (n = 228) was characterized by higher gestational-age (38.6 ± 0.9 vs. 35.1 ± 1.8 weeks, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of insulin treatment (32.9% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.023). Placentas from the singleton group were characterized by higher rates of MVM lesions (54.4% vs. 30.7%, p < 0.001), villitis of unknown etiology (VUE, 5.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.040), villous immaturity (10.1% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.001), and placental weight <10th percentile (16.7% vs. 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.049). Using multivariable regression analysis, MVM (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.6-4.1), VUE (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), villous immaturity (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-7.6), and placental weight <10th percentile (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.02-1.6), were the only lesions associated with singleton pregnancies. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was more common in the twin group (54.3% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001) and it was associated only with lower GA (aOR = 3.7, 95% CI 2.1-7.3).
CONCLUSION: Higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile, MVM lesions, villous immaturity, and VUE characterize GDM singleton pregnancy as compared to twins GDM gestation, suggesting different placental alterations in the diabetic environment.
METHODS: Maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, and placental histopathology reports of pregnancies complicated by GDM, between 1/2008-10/2016, were reviewed. Results were compared between singletons (singleton group) and dichorionic-diamniotic twins (twin group). Placental lesions were classified as placental weight abnormalities, maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion lesions (MVM, FVM), inflammatory lesions, and lesions associated with chronic villitis. LGA was defined as birth-weight ≥90th percentile. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as one or more early neonatal complications.
RESULTS: Compared with the twin group (n = 57), the singleton group (n = 228) was characterized by higher gestational-age (38.6 ± 0.9 vs. 35.1 ± 1.8 weeks, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of insulin treatment (32.9% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.023). Placentas from the singleton group were characterized by higher rates of MVM lesions (54.4% vs. 30.7%, p < 0.001), villitis of unknown etiology (VUE, 5.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.040), villous immaturity (10.1% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.001), and placental weight <10th percentile (16.7% vs. 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.049). Using multivariable regression analysis, MVM (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.6-4.1), VUE (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), villous immaturity (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-7.6), and placental weight <10th percentile (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.02-1.6), were the only lesions associated with singleton pregnancies. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was more common in the twin group (54.3% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001) and it was associated only with lower GA (aOR = 3.7, 95% CI 2.1-7.3).
CONCLUSION: Higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile, MVM lesions, villous immaturity, and VUE characterize GDM singleton pregnancy as compared to twins GDM gestation, suggesting different placental alterations in the diabetic environment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app