Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Antifungal susceptibility testing results of New Zealand yeast isolates, 2001-2015: Impact of recent CLSI breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values for Candida and other yeast species.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the antifungal susceptibility testing results of local yeast isolates (2001-2015) to record the impact of recently updated interpretive criteria and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) for yeast species.

METHODS: Susceptibility testing was performed using Sensititre® YeastOne® . The results were interpreted following CLSI criteria or YeastOne-derived ECVs.

RESULTS: A total of 2345 isolates were tested; 62.0% were from sterile body sites or tissue. Application of new CLSI interpretative criteria for fluconazole increased the proportion of non-susceptible isolates of Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata (P≤0.03 for all species). For voriconazole, the greatest increase was for C. tropicalis (P<0.0001). Application of new CLSI interpretive criteria for caspofungin increased the proportion of non-susceptible isolates for C. glabrata and Pichia kudriavzevii (P<0.0001 for both). The new amphotericin ECV (≤2mg/L) did not reveal any non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates in the five species covered. YeastOne itraconazole ECVs detected 2%, 5% and 6% non-WT isolates for P. kudriavzevii, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata, respectively. No itraconazole non-WT isolates of Clavispora lusitaniae were detected.

CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most results are similar to other large surveys of fungal susceptibility, the new CLSI interpretive criteria significantly altered the proportion of non-susceptible isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin for several Candida spp. Application of CLSI and YeastOne-derived ECVs revealed the presence of a low proportion of non-WT isolates for many species. The results serve as a baseline to monitor the susceptibility of Candida and other yeast species in New Zealand over time.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app