Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effect of Simulated Patient Practice on the Self-Efficacy of Japanese Undergraduate Dietitians in Nutrition Care Process Skills.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of an adapted simulated patient (SP) intervention on self-efficacy in nutrition care process skills.

DESIGN: A repeated-measures design using a 25-item survey divided into 7 nutrition professional practice competencies (PPCs) employing a 5-point self-efficacy scale (1 = lowest to 5 = highest) administered immediately before and after the intervention.

SETTING: A private Japanese university.

PARTICIPANTS: Ninety Japanese third-year dietetics undergraduates aged 20-38 years.

INTERVENTION: An adapted SP activity practicing nutrition care process skills for the infirm elderly population.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- to postintervention self-efficacy response scores and feedback.

ANALYSIS: Mean preintervention survey scores were used to divide participants into statistical quartiles (Q1 indicated lowest mean scores and Q3 , highest mean scores). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared each PPC's pre- and postintervention means. Kruskal-Wallis tests examined changes in quartiles' scores within each PPC.

RESULTS: Self-efficacy improved significantly in PPCs relating to application of appropriate medical ethics and interpersonal skills (P = .02), appropriate nutrition assessment (P = .04), and creation of a nutrition management plan and nutrition intervention (P = .03). Self-efficacy of Q1 and Q2 rose significantly in most PPCs, although not for acting as a dietitian within a medical care team, whereas that of Q3 decreased for all PPCs.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Among initially low self-efficacy dietetics undergraduates, the SP intervention enhanced self-efficacy in 3 of the 6 PPCs practiced directly and may facilitate more realistic self-views among initially high self-efficacy students. However, further research in the design, implementation, and efficacy of this type of training is recommended to gauge its effects on the quality of related professional practice.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app