JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio a clinical relevant preoperative biomarker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma? A meta-analysis of 4385 patients.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative blood-based inflammatory biomarkers have been suggested to improve staging and prognostication in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is the most studied blood-based biomarker. NLR is an indicator of systemic inflammation and has been shown to be associated with a poor prognosis in various malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze the current evidence regarding the prognostic significance of preoperative NLR in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC to assess its prognostic potential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of Web of Science, Medline/PubMed and Cochrane library was performed on the 1st of October, 2017. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared patients with high NLR before surgical treatment for UTUC to patients with low NLR to determine its predictive value for survival using multivariable logistic regression analysis. We performed a formal meta-analysis for cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: Nine studies including a total of 4385 patients assessing the importance of NLR were included in this meta-analysis. The cut-off NLR varied in the eligible studies ranging from 2 to 3. Increased pretreatment NLR predicted OS (pooled HR 1.64 95% CI; 1.23-2.17), RFS (pooled HR 1.60 95% CI; 1.16-2.20) and CSS (pooled HR 1.73 95% CI; 1.23-2.44) in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, preoperative blood-based NLR is associated with worse prognosis in patients who underwent RNU for UTUC. NLR could be used to improve clinical decision making regarding RNU vs. kidney-sparing surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, perioperative systemic therapy and follow-up schedule.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app