We have located links that may give you full text access.
Variability in Intensity Related to Increased Overall Bout Intensity.
American Journal of Health Behavior 2018 March 2
OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between variability in self-regulated exercise intensity and overall intensity during acute exercise.
METHODS: Overall, 32 participants (age; 20±4y, body mass index (BMI) 24.1±3.6 kg/m2) completed a 30-minute self-regulated treadmill exercise bout. Participants were blinded to treadmill settings and adjusted speed and incline every 5-minutes as desired.
RESULTS: Variability in exercise intensity (metabolic equivalent standard deviation (METSD)) was positively correlated with (r = .567, p = .001) and explained a significant portion of the overall exercise intensity (ß = .574, t = 3.713, p = .001). When accounting for physiological variables, METSD (ß = .381, t = 2.242, p = .034) and VO2peak (ß = .575, t = 2.864, p = .008) predicted overall intensity. When controlling for physiological and psychological variables, in addition to METSD (ß = .388), tolerance for exercise intensity (ß = 3.124) became a significant predictor of overall bout intensity (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In-task variability in exercise intensity was posi- tively related to the average intensity of the bout. Future studies should explore the utility of explicitly encouraging individuals to incorporate intra-bout variety for increasing the exercise dose while maintaining a degree of autonomy.
METHODS: Overall, 32 participants (age; 20±4y, body mass index (BMI) 24.1±3.6 kg/m2) completed a 30-minute self-regulated treadmill exercise bout. Participants were blinded to treadmill settings and adjusted speed and incline every 5-minutes as desired.
RESULTS: Variability in exercise intensity (metabolic equivalent standard deviation (METSD)) was positively correlated with (r = .567, p = .001) and explained a significant portion of the overall exercise intensity (ß = .574, t = 3.713, p = .001). When accounting for physiological variables, METSD (ß = .381, t = 2.242, p = .034) and VO2peak (ß = .575, t = 2.864, p = .008) predicted overall intensity. When controlling for physiological and psychological variables, in addition to METSD (ß = .388), tolerance for exercise intensity (ß = 3.124) became a significant predictor of overall bout intensity (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In-task variability in exercise intensity was posi- tively related to the average intensity of the bout. Future studies should explore the utility of explicitly encouraging individuals to incorporate intra-bout variety for increasing the exercise dose while maintaining a degree of autonomy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app