We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism.
Thrombosis Journal 2018
Background: An incidental/unsuspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (IPE) in cancer patients is a frequent occurrence. This single-institution analysis of uniformly managed patients investigates short and long-term outcomes and proposes a prognostic risk score, aiming to assist clinical decision-making.
Methods: Data from a prospectively recorded cohort of 234 consecutive cancer patients with IPE were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox regression survival methods were used to identify factors with independent association with early (30-day, 3-month, 6-month) mortality and survival. Receiver operator characteristic analysis (ROC) was used to assess appropriate cut-offs for continuous variables and the fitness of prognostic scoring.
Results: 30-day, 3-month and 6-month mortality was 3.4% ( n = 8), 15% ( n = 35) and 31% ( n = 72) respectively. Recurrence during anticoagulation occurred in 2.6% ( n = 6) and major haemorrhage in 2.1% ( n = 5) of the patients. A prognostic score incorporating performance status (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-4) and the presence of new or worsening symptoms, with and without the consideration of the presence of incurable malignancy, correlated with overall survival ( p < .001 respectively) as well as early mortality (AUC = .821, p = .004 and AUC = .805, p = 0.006, respectively).
Conclusion: A simple prognostic score incorporating basic oncologic clinical assessment and self-reported symptomatology could reliably stratify the mortality risk of ambulant cancer patients and IPE.
Trial registration: Audit registration No. 2013.287, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals Trust, 29/11/2013.
Methods: Data from a prospectively recorded cohort of 234 consecutive cancer patients with IPE were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox regression survival methods were used to identify factors with independent association with early (30-day, 3-month, 6-month) mortality and survival. Receiver operator characteristic analysis (ROC) was used to assess appropriate cut-offs for continuous variables and the fitness of prognostic scoring.
Results: 30-day, 3-month and 6-month mortality was 3.4% ( n = 8), 15% ( n = 35) and 31% ( n = 72) respectively. Recurrence during anticoagulation occurred in 2.6% ( n = 6) and major haemorrhage in 2.1% ( n = 5) of the patients. A prognostic score incorporating performance status (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-4) and the presence of new or worsening symptoms, with and without the consideration of the presence of incurable malignancy, correlated with overall survival ( p < .001 respectively) as well as early mortality (AUC = .821, p = .004 and AUC = .805, p = 0.006, respectively).
Conclusion: A simple prognostic score incorporating basic oncologic clinical assessment and self-reported symptomatology could reliably stratify the mortality risk of ambulant cancer patients and IPE.
Trial registration: Audit registration No. 2013.287, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals Trust, 29/11/2013.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app