We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
The use of cerebral imaging for investigating delirium aetiology.
European Journal of Internal Medicine 2018 June
BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the frequency and patterns of use of cerebral imaging in delirium and to describe pathological changes associated with delirium using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with delirium admitted to a tertiary hospital (The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia) between January 2015 and August 2016. Data on cerebral imaging was collected and positive imaging findings were defined as: Acute or subacute infarct, haemorrhage, abscess, neoplasm, vasculitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, encephalitis, acute demyelination, or fat embolism.
RESULTS: There were 1653 (5% of 32,725) patients with delirium (median age 80 years, inter-quartile range 71-86, 54% male). Thirty-three percent (N = 538) had cerebral imaging (CT only: N = 457, MRI only: N = 10, both: N = 71). In 11% (N = 57) of patients, CT brain scans were positive. MRI brain was completed in 17 patients with a positive CT (17/57), changing the diagnosis in two cases. Fifty-four patients with negative CT scans also had MRI brain; 33% (N = 18) of these were positive. Younger patients were more likely to have MRI compared to CT brain scan. Patients admitted to a neurology unit were more likely to have cerebral imaging.
CONCLUSION: Use of CT brain was common in delirium patients, with an 11% rate of positive findings. Fewer patients had MRI brain scans, which added diagnostic information in some cases. Future studies are needed to define the significance of cerebral imaging in delirium management and establish guidelines for its use.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with delirium admitted to a tertiary hospital (The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia) between January 2015 and August 2016. Data on cerebral imaging was collected and positive imaging findings were defined as: Acute or subacute infarct, haemorrhage, abscess, neoplasm, vasculitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, encephalitis, acute demyelination, or fat embolism.
RESULTS: There were 1653 (5% of 32,725) patients with delirium (median age 80 years, inter-quartile range 71-86, 54% male). Thirty-three percent (N = 538) had cerebral imaging (CT only: N = 457, MRI only: N = 10, both: N = 71). In 11% (N = 57) of patients, CT brain scans were positive. MRI brain was completed in 17 patients with a positive CT (17/57), changing the diagnosis in two cases. Fifty-four patients with negative CT scans also had MRI brain; 33% (N = 18) of these were positive. Younger patients were more likely to have MRI compared to CT brain scan. Patients admitted to a neurology unit were more likely to have cerebral imaging.
CONCLUSION: Use of CT brain was common in delirium patients, with an 11% rate of positive findings. Fewer patients had MRI brain scans, which added diagnostic information in some cases. Future studies are needed to define the significance of cerebral imaging in delirium management and establish guidelines for its use.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app