Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

An In Vitro Biomechanical Study on Ovine Rib Flexibility With Increasing Deconstruction-As an Alternative to Rib Resection for Costoplasty.

Spine Deformity 2018 March
STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study into the effect of rib deconstruction on the flexibility in ovine ribs, using three-point bending.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and possible effectiveness of a more conservative costoplasty using an in vitro animal model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Costoplasty remains useful in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, rib hump, and associated chest wall deformities. However, traditional costoplasty increases morbidity and blood loss.

METHODS: Ribs 2-10 were dissected from four fresh half ovine rib cages. The ribs were randomly allocated to Groups 1 to 4. The ribs underwent deconstruction, 10 mm from the lateral tubercle and 30 mm long, according to their group: Group 1 = control; Group 2 = convex cortical bone removed; Group 3 = convex cortical and cancellous bone removed; Group 4 = all but the ventral cortex is removed. Flexibility was tested by loading the concave side of each rib while fixed at the rib head and equidistant from the center of the resected area. The ribs were deformed at 0.5 mm/s up to a maximum load of 9.99 kg or fracturing. Load was plotted against displacement to find the load/displacement coefficient for each group. Statistical analysis was by an analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc testing.

RESULTS: The load/displacement coefficients were as follows: Group 1 = 131.93 (±27.52) N/mm, Group 2 = 93.36 (±40.71) N/mm, Group 3 = 88.66 (±25.84) N/mm, and Group 4 = 29.69 (±29.11) N/mm. Group 4 was significantly less stiff than Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p < .01). No ribs in Groups 1, 2, and 4 fractured. Five of 8 ribs in Group 3 fractured during loading.

CONCLUSIONS: Deconstructing the rib down to the concave side significantly increases the flexibility by approximately 4.5 times. Despite large removal of bone, it retains the ability to withstand 10 kg of load without fracture.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app