Distal fibular malrotation and lateral ankle contact characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Any amount of malreduction of the syndesmotic joint compared with the uninjured syndesmosis has been associated with an adverse effect on functional outcome. The amount of malrotation that may lead to clinically relevant pressure change in this joint has not been reported. Our purpose was to determine whether small degrees of external and internal malrotation would be associated with statistically significant changes in contact pressure in the tibiofibular and talofibular articulations.

METHODS: Twelve cadaveric ankles were osteotomized above the syndesmosis and instrumented with a rotatable distal fibula plate. Sensors at the distal tibiofibular and talofibular articulations recorded contact pressure and area at neutral position and at 5 and 10° of external and internal malrotation through a full range of ankle motion.

RESULTS: Compared with neutral rotation, there was a significant decrease in contact pressure at the talofibular articulation with external rotation of 5° (103±113kPa versus 52±69kPa; P=0.01) and 10° (43±62kPa; P=0.01) in plantarflexion.Contact pressure at the tibiofibular articulation in plantarflexion increased with 10° of internal malrotation compared with neutral rotation (56±30kPa versus 74±38kPa; P=0.05) in plantarflexion. Contact area decreased significantly with plantarflexion and 10° of external rotation and increased significantly in plantarflexion and after cyclic loading with 10° of internal rotation (P≤0.05).

CONCLUSION: Any degree of distal fibular external rotation significantly reduced contact pressure in the talofibular articulation with plantarflexion. A minimal increase in contact pressure was found in the tibiofibular and talofibular joints with plantarflexion and mild internal rotation of 5°, but pressure increased significantly in both articulations with 10° of internal rotation. The findings support clinical findings that subtle degrees of fibular malrotation may be associated with alteration of lateral ankle mechanics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Controlled biomechanical study.