We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Surgical management of large talar osteochondral defects using autologous chondrocyte implantation.
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons 2018 April
BACKGROUND: Talar osteochondral lesions (OLT) occur frequently in ankle sprains and fractures. We hypothesize that matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) will have a low reoperation rate and high patient satisfaction rate in treating OLT less than 2.5cm2 .
METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed with PRISMA guidelines using three publicly available free databases. Clinical outcome investigations reporting OLT outcomes with levels of evidence I-IV were eligible for inclusion. All study, subject, and surgical technique demographics were analyzed and compared. Statistics were calculated using Student's t-tests, one-way ANOVA, chi-squared, and two-proportion Z-tests.
RESULTS: Nineteen articles met our inclusion criteria, which resulted in a total of 343 patients. Six studies pertained to arthroscopic MACI, 8 to open MACI, and 5 studies to open periosteal ACI (PACI). All studies were Level IV evidence. Due to study quality, imprecise and sparse data, and potential for reporting bias, the quality of evidence is low. In comparison of open and arthroscopic MACI, we found both advantages favoring open MACI. However, open MACI had higher complication rates.
CONCLUSIONS: No procedure demonstrates superiority or inferiority between the combination of open or arthroscopic MACI and PACI in the management of OLT less than 2.5cm2 . Ultimately, well-designed randomized trials are needed to address the limitation of the available literature and further our understanding of the optimal treatment options.
METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed with PRISMA guidelines using three publicly available free databases. Clinical outcome investigations reporting OLT outcomes with levels of evidence I-IV were eligible for inclusion. All study, subject, and surgical technique demographics were analyzed and compared. Statistics were calculated using Student's t-tests, one-way ANOVA, chi-squared, and two-proportion Z-tests.
RESULTS: Nineteen articles met our inclusion criteria, which resulted in a total of 343 patients. Six studies pertained to arthroscopic MACI, 8 to open MACI, and 5 studies to open periosteal ACI (PACI). All studies were Level IV evidence. Due to study quality, imprecise and sparse data, and potential for reporting bias, the quality of evidence is low. In comparison of open and arthroscopic MACI, we found both advantages favoring open MACI. However, open MACI had higher complication rates.
CONCLUSIONS: No procedure demonstrates superiority or inferiority between the combination of open or arthroscopic MACI and PACI in the management of OLT less than 2.5cm2 . Ultimately, well-designed randomized trials are needed to address the limitation of the available literature and further our understanding of the optimal treatment options.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app