We have located links that may give you full text access.
Steroid Allergy: Clinical Features and the Importance of Excipient Testing in a Diagnostic Algorithm.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in Practice 2018 September
BACKGROUND: True corticosteroid (CS) allergy is rare. Instead, many patients may be allergic to excipients found in various CS preparations. Excipient testing is frequently overlooked. It might lead to unnecessary CS avoidance or dangerous re-exposure.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and frequency of excipient allergy in patients with confirmed type I hypersensitivity to systemic CS preparations.
METHODS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of allergy (positive skin test or drug provocation test [DPT]) or tolerance (negative DPT to CS) over the past 10 years were studied. Patient characteristics, index CS, route of administration, clinical indications, symptoms of index reaction, and outcomes of CS/excipient allergy testing were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent CS allergy testing. True CS allergy was confirmed in 9 of 64 (14%) patients. The majority (5/9, 56%) with positive skin tests or DPT were actually allergic to the excipients (2 to carboxymethylcellulose and 3 to polyethylene glycol) rather than the CS. Respiratory manifestations were significantly associated with confirmed allergy (odds ratio = 6.79 [95% confidence interval = 1.36-34.03], P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory manifestations were significantly more likely to be truly allergic. CS allergies are rare and may be overdiagnosed without excipient testing. We suggest the use of Carmellose eye drops as a readily available source of carboxymethylcellulose for testing and propose a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm for suspected CS allergy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and frequency of excipient allergy in patients with confirmed type I hypersensitivity to systemic CS preparations.
METHODS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of allergy (positive skin test or drug provocation test [DPT]) or tolerance (negative DPT to CS) over the past 10 years were studied. Patient characteristics, index CS, route of administration, clinical indications, symptoms of index reaction, and outcomes of CS/excipient allergy testing were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent CS allergy testing. True CS allergy was confirmed in 9 of 64 (14%) patients. The majority (5/9, 56%) with positive skin tests or DPT were actually allergic to the excipients (2 to carboxymethylcellulose and 3 to polyethylene glycol) rather than the CS. Respiratory manifestations were significantly associated with confirmed allergy (odds ratio = 6.79 [95% confidence interval = 1.36-34.03], P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory manifestations were significantly more likely to be truly allergic. CS allergies are rare and may be overdiagnosed without excipient testing. We suggest the use of Carmellose eye drops as a readily available source of carboxymethylcellulose for testing and propose a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm for suspected CS allergy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app