We have located links that may give you full text access.
Subaxillary approach to cardiac electronic device implantation using a single surgical incision: a single-centre experience.
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2018 June 2
OBJECTIVES: Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators have become more common in younger individuals, owing to broader indications and technological advances. Our goal was to report our long-term experience of implanting cardiac devices in young adults via a subaxillary approach with a hidden single incision, to minimize the aesthetic impact of the device.
METHODS: From 2003 to 2012, 23 patients underwent cardiac device implantation via a subaxillary approach while they were under general anaesthesia. The axillary vein was punctured under contrast-medium radiological guidance. The devices were positioned into the pocket under the pectoralis major muscle and over the fascia that envelopes the pectoralis minor muscle, through a lateral surgical access along the midaxillary line.
RESULTS: Twenty-two single- and dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and 1 dual-chamber pacemaker were implanted (mean age 32.2 ± 13.4 years). All procedures were successfully performed without complications; overall hospitalization after implantation was 3.3 days. During mean a follow-up of 65 ± 18 months, no deaths, infections or device migrations occurred. Two ventricular lead dislodgements requiring repositioning occurred within 1 month, and 1 defibrillation lead fracture occurred 5 years after implantation. All patients were extremely satisfied with the aesthetic result. A mild increase in the pacing threshold (0.88 ± 0.6 V at 0.4/0.5 ms at implantation vs 1.00 ± 0.3 V at 0.4/0.5 ms at 2-year follow-up, P = 0.063) and a statistically significant decrease in the pacing impedance (637 ± 161 ohm at implantation vs 499 ± 81 ohm at 2-year follow-up, P = 0.001) were observed, without any consequences.
CONCLUSIONS: The subaxillary approach is a safe, feasible technique that requires a simple surgical procedure. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator functions properly at implantation and at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: From 2003 to 2012, 23 patients underwent cardiac device implantation via a subaxillary approach while they were under general anaesthesia. The axillary vein was punctured under contrast-medium radiological guidance. The devices were positioned into the pocket under the pectoralis major muscle and over the fascia that envelopes the pectoralis minor muscle, through a lateral surgical access along the midaxillary line.
RESULTS: Twenty-two single- and dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and 1 dual-chamber pacemaker were implanted (mean age 32.2 ± 13.4 years). All procedures were successfully performed without complications; overall hospitalization after implantation was 3.3 days. During mean a follow-up of 65 ± 18 months, no deaths, infections or device migrations occurred. Two ventricular lead dislodgements requiring repositioning occurred within 1 month, and 1 defibrillation lead fracture occurred 5 years after implantation. All patients were extremely satisfied with the aesthetic result. A mild increase in the pacing threshold (0.88 ± 0.6 V at 0.4/0.5 ms at implantation vs 1.00 ± 0.3 V at 0.4/0.5 ms at 2-year follow-up, P = 0.063) and a statistically significant decrease in the pacing impedance (637 ± 161 ohm at implantation vs 499 ± 81 ohm at 2-year follow-up, P = 0.001) were observed, without any consequences.
CONCLUSIONS: The subaxillary approach is a safe, feasible technique that requires a simple surgical procedure. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator functions properly at implantation and at long-term follow-up.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app