Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The influence of fluid management on outcomes in preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal fluid management strategy to ensure best outcomes in preeclamptic patients remains a controversial issue, with little evidence to support any one approach.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of various fluid management strategies on clinical outcomes, haemodynamic indices and biochemical markers in preeclamptic women and their babies. Primary outcome measures were the occurrence of pulmonary oedema and/or the development of renal impairment.

METHODS: A systematic review of randomised fluid management strategies was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched using the expanded search terms: 'intravenous fluid', 'plasma substitutes', 'intravenous fluid management', 'intravenous fluid therapy', plasma volume expansion', 'fluid restriction', 'oncotic therapy', 'crystalloids', 'colloids', 'preeclampsia', 'toxemia of pregnancy', 'pregnancy-induced hypertension', 'eclampsia' and 'gestational proteinuric hypertension'.

RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), from nine publications, were included in the final analysis. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence of pulmonary oedema, perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and caesarean section. Colloid volume expansion was associated with a significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but had no effect on heart rate or cardiac index. Data on systemic vascular resistance (SVR), serum atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and urine volume could not be aggregated.

CONCLUSION: Data on the ideal fluid strategy in women with preeclampsia is limited, and insufficient to make any strong recommendations. Further randomised controlled studies are needed to provide more evidence for which fluid management strategies are best suited to this heterogeneous patient group.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app