Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Efficacy of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin and Recombinant Human Interleukin 11 for Treatment of Chemotherapy Indu-ced Thrombocytopenia in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin(rhTPO) and recombinant human interleukin11(rhIL-11) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients.

METHODS: Total of 96 adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients were divided into 3 groups according to randomized controlled method: rhTPO group, rhIL-11 group and control group, 32 cases in each group. The patients in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 received rhTPO of 15000 IU/d and rhIL-11 of 1.5 mg/d, respectively after the standard combined chemotherapy within 24 hours, and patients in control group, received nothing drugs to promote thrombocyte recovery. And rhTPO and rhIL-11 should be stopped when the Plt≥100× 109 /L. After chemotherapy, the platelet recovery degree, duration of Plt<50× 109 /L, ≥50× 109 /L and ≥100× 109 /L, the count of infusion thrombocytes, and incidence of adverse reactions all were compared.

RESULTS: The duration of Plt<50× 109 /L was obviously less than that in control group(P<0.01). The duration of rhIL-11 was less than that in control group, but there was no statistical significance(P>0.05). As compared with that in control group, the Plt count in rhTPO and rhIL-11 groups can faster increase to Plt≥50× 109 /L (P<0.01, P<0.05), among them the Plt count in rhTPO group faster increase, but there was no statistical signiticance. As compared with that in control group, the Plt count in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 group can increase to Plt≥100× 109 /L (P<0.01), the Plt count in rhTPO group was more obviously increase than that in rhIL-11 group(P<0.05). The count of infusion Plt in rhTPO and rhIL-11 groups was lese than that in control group(P<0.01, P<0.05), and the count of infusion Plt in rhTPO group was less than that in rhIL-11 group(P<0.05). After using rhTPO and rhIL-11, the adverse reactions, such as low fever, induration of injection site, athralgia, nausea and vomiting occured in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 group, but all can be tolerated.

CONCLUSION: Both rhTPO and rhIL-11 can reduce the duration of thrombocytopenia and the amount of infused thrombocyte, promote platelet recovery in the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia after chemotherapy, to decreae the risk of bleeding, and reduce incidence of adverse reactions, both of them can be tolerated by patients, and rhTPO is more advantage than rhIL-11, worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app