Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of the Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQOL) Questionnaire in a Community-Based Sample of Healthy Infants in China.

Objective Evaluate the feasibility and psychometric properties of the Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQOL) questionnaire as a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a sample of Chinese infants. Methods The linguistically validated Simplified Chinese version of the ITQOL was used in a multicenter, observational study of healthy, term infants (N = 427), age 6 weeks at enrollment, in China. At Days 1 and 48, parents/guardians completed the ITQOL, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2) and the Infant Gastrointestinal Symptom Questionnaire (IGSQ). ITQOL feasibility, reliability, ceiling/floor effects, concurrent validity and discriminatory validity were evaluated. Results Feasibility of administering the ITQOL was supported by strong response rates (> 97%) with < 1% missing items for all scales except physical abilities. Reliability was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70) for all scales except Day 1 General Health (0.67). Floor effects were minimal (< 2%), except Day 1 physical abilities (7%). Ceiling effects increased from Days 1 to 48 across all scales. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations between ITQOL infant-focused scales and IGSQ score (r = -0.20 to - 0.34, p < 0.001) and between parent-focused scales and SF-12v2 mental health composite (MCS) scores (r = 0.29-0.46, p < 0.001). ITQOL scales discriminated between infant subgroups based on illness-related outcomes (sick visits, adverse events) and between parent subgroups based on SF-12v2 MCS scores. Conclusion The Simplified Chinese version of the ITQOL performed well in a community-based sample of Chinese infants, with evidence supporting the instrument's feasibility, reliability, and validity. These data support the ITQOL as a valuable tool to assess HRQOL in Chinese infants.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app