Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Classic Primary Hyperparathyroidism Versus Normocalcemic and Normohormonal Variants: Do They Really Differ?

BACKGROUND: Normocalcemic (NCpHPT) and normohormonal (NHpHPT) variants have been recognized primary hyperparathyroidism entities that pose serious challenges. We sought to define the differences among them in a series of surgically treated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 149 patients were enrolled into three groups: CpHPT (Ca > 10.2 mg/dL, PTH > 65 pg/mL), NCpHPT (normal Ca, PTH > 65 pg/mL) and NHpHPT (Ca > 10.2 mg/dL, normal PTH). Descriptive statistics and inter-group differences were computed, whereas multiple logistic/linear regression tests were used for further analysis.

RESULTS: Of these patients 125 were female and 24 male, mean age 56.3 years (range 8-83). A total of 115 (77.2%) patients presented with CpHPT, 23 (15.4%) with NCpHPT and 11 (7.4%) with NHpHPT. MGD was found in 25 (16.8%) patients and SGD in 124 (83.2%); multivariate analysis failed to reveal statistically significant association of MGD with any pHPT variant (CpHPT 16.5% vs NCpHPT 21.7% vs NHpHPT 9.1%, p = 0.726). Conversely, NCpHPT patients exhibited statistically significant smaller adenoma weight (p = 0.023). Moreover, U/S in these patients had smaller positive predictive value (p = 0.278), whereas concordance between U/S and MIBI was also lower (p = 0.669). The utility of MIBI and U/S differed significantly (p < 0.001); more frequent use of U/S was observed for all groups. However, their predictive values did not differ significantly (p = 0.832).

CONCLUSIONS: NCpHPT is more similar than different to CpHPT. NCpHPT constitutes the most challenging entity: it is associated with smaller adenoma weight, whereas U/S exhibited lower positive predictive value and lower concordance rate with MIBI. A trend for higher MGD presence in this group of patients was observed, though without statistical significance.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app