We have located links that may give you full text access.
Lack of Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Cognitive Decline.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Studies of association between use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and dementia have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the effects of PPIs on cognitive decline in a study of middle-aged and elderly twins in Denmark.
METHODS: In a prospective study, we collected data from surveys of middle-aged individuals (46-67 years old; the Middle Aged Danish Twin study) and older individuals (the Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins) who underwent cognitive assessments (a 5-component test battery) over a 10-year period (middle-age study, n = 2346) or a 2-year period (longitudinal study of aging: n = 2475). We determined cumulative use of PPIs 2 years prior study enrollment and during follow up, in defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs, using data from a nationwide prescription register. Multi-variable linear regression models were used to examine associations between cumulative PPI use and a composite score of cognitive function at baseline and decreases in scores during the follow-up periods.
RESULTS: Use of PPIs before study enrollment was associated with a slightly lower mean cognitive score at baseline in the middle age study. The adjusted difference in mean score of individuals with high consumption of PPIs (≥400 DDD) was lower than that of non-users in the middle-age study (mean crude score for high PPI use, 43.4 ± 13.1 vs for non-use, 46.8 ± 10.2; adjusted difference of 0.69 points; 95% CI, -4.98 to 3.61). In the longitudinal study of aging twins, individuals with high consumption of PPI had higher adjusted scores than non-users (mean crude score for high PPI use, 35.2 ± 10.8 vs for non-use, 36.2 ± 11.1; adjusted difference of 0.95 points; 95% CI, -1.88 to 3.79). In analyses of cognitive decline, among individuals with high consumption of PPIs in the longitudinal study of aging, the adjusted mean difference between baseline score and follow-up score was lower than that of non-users (mean crude score for high PPI use at baseline, 36.6 ± 10.1 and at follow up, 34.3 ± 12.3 vs for non-use at baseline, 38.1 ± 10.5 and at follow up, 37.6 ± 11.3; adjusted difference of -1.22 points; 95% CI, -3.73 to 1.29). In the middle-age study, users with the highest consumption of PPIs (≥1600 DDD) had slightly less cognitive decline than non-users (baseline mean crude score for high PPI use, 43.4 ± 10.1 and follow-up mean crude score, 41.3 ± 9.7 vs baseline score of 49.1 ± 10.2 for non-users and follow-up score of 46.3 ± 9.9 for non-users; adjusted difference of 0.94 points; 95% CI, -1.63 to 3.50). No stated differences in scores between PPI users and non-users were significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In analyzing data from 2 large population-based studies of twins in Denmark, we found no association between PPI use and cognitive decline.
METHODS: In a prospective study, we collected data from surveys of middle-aged individuals (46-67 years old; the Middle Aged Danish Twin study) and older individuals (the Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins) who underwent cognitive assessments (a 5-component test battery) over a 10-year period (middle-age study, n = 2346) or a 2-year period (longitudinal study of aging: n = 2475). We determined cumulative use of PPIs 2 years prior study enrollment and during follow up, in defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs, using data from a nationwide prescription register. Multi-variable linear regression models were used to examine associations between cumulative PPI use and a composite score of cognitive function at baseline and decreases in scores during the follow-up periods.
RESULTS: Use of PPIs before study enrollment was associated with a slightly lower mean cognitive score at baseline in the middle age study. The adjusted difference in mean score of individuals with high consumption of PPIs (≥400 DDD) was lower than that of non-users in the middle-age study (mean crude score for high PPI use, 43.4 ± 13.1 vs for non-use, 46.8 ± 10.2; adjusted difference of 0.69 points; 95% CI, -4.98 to 3.61). In the longitudinal study of aging twins, individuals with high consumption of PPI had higher adjusted scores than non-users (mean crude score for high PPI use, 35.2 ± 10.8 vs for non-use, 36.2 ± 11.1; adjusted difference of 0.95 points; 95% CI, -1.88 to 3.79). In analyses of cognitive decline, among individuals with high consumption of PPIs in the longitudinal study of aging, the adjusted mean difference between baseline score and follow-up score was lower than that of non-users (mean crude score for high PPI use at baseline, 36.6 ± 10.1 and at follow up, 34.3 ± 12.3 vs for non-use at baseline, 38.1 ± 10.5 and at follow up, 37.6 ± 11.3; adjusted difference of -1.22 points; 95% CI, -3.73 to 1.29). In the middle-age study, users with the highest consumption of PPIs (≥1600 DDD) had slightly less cognitive decline than non-users (baseline mean crude score for high PPI use, 43.4 ± 10.1 and follow-up mean crude score, 41.3 ± 9.7 vs baseline score of 49.1 ± 10.2 for non-users and follow-up score of 46.3 ± 9.9 for non-users; adjusted difference of 0.94 points; 95% CI, -1.63 to 3.50). No stated differences in scores between PPI users and non-users were significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In analyzing data from 2 large population-based studies of twins in Denmark, we found no association between PPI use and cognitive decline.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app