Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of diode laser trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation versus implantation of a 350-mm 2 Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device for the treatment of glaucoma in dogs (a retrospective study: 2010-2016).

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes following trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP) and 350-mm2 Baerveldt implantation in the treatment of canine refractory glaucoma.

DESIGN: Retrospective case study.

CASE SELECTION: Client owned dogs undergoing surgical treatment of glaucoma within a veterinary referral hospital.

PROCEDURES: Eighty-six glaucoma surgeries were performed on 83 eyes (69 dogs) diagnosed with primary or secondary glaucoma. Medical records were retrieved, and baseline data, surgery, medications, intraocular pressures (IOPs), vision, and complications were extracted.

RESULTS: Fifty-four eyes (44 dogs) were treated with TSCP and placement of an anterior chamber suture shunt; 28 eyes (24 dogs) were implanted with a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device (GDD); and four eyes (4 dogs) underwent GDD implantation after failure of TSCP to manage IOP. Following TSCP, IOP control (<20 mmHg) and vision retention occurred in 81.5% and 42.6%, respectively, for 16.1 ± 1.36 months. Following GDD implantation, 71.4% maintained IOP <20 mmHg and 69.6% maintained vision for 11.0 ± 0.94 months. IOP control without loss of vision was more likely following Baerveldt implantation (17/28; 60.7%) than TSCP (19/54; 35.2%) (P = 0.027). One eye had functional vision restored following GDD placement. IOP control without adjunctive medications was more likely following Baerveldt implantation (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, eyes treated with Baerveldt GDD implantation were more likely to maintain IOP control and retain vision compared to eyes treated with TSCP and placement of an anterior chamber suture shunt. Lack of formal randomization, inconsistencies in surgical techniques and TSCP protocols, and potential unmeasured confounders must be considered when extrapolating from this retrospective study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app