Prospective Randomized Trial of Use of In-House Prepared Low-Cost Radiopharmaceutical Versus Commercial Radiopharmaceutical for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current standard-of-care for surgical staging of the axilla in clinically node-negative (N0) early breast cancers is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which requires expensive radiopharmaceuticals for efficacious results. In-house produced low-cost radiopharmaceuticals may be the solution and have shown efficacy in earlier observational/pilot studies. We compared SLNB using in-house prepared radiopharmaceutical (99m Tc-Antimony-colloid) versus commercially marketed radiopharmaceutical (99m Tc-Sulphur-colloid) in this prospective randomized study.

STUDY DESIGN: 78 clinically N0 early breast cancer patients (T1/2, N0 stages), undergoing primary surgery were prospectively randomized 1:1 into two groups; to receive SLNB using methylene blue, and either 99m Tc-Antimony colloid (Group-1) or  99m Tc-Sulphur colloid (Group-2). Completion axillary dissection was done in all (validation SLNB). SLNB indices were compared between the groups.

RESULTS: The groups were comparable with regard to age, stage, tumour size, hormone receptors and HER2neu status. Cost of the in-house prepared 99m Tc-antimony colloid was 16-times lesser compared to 99m Tc-sulphur colloid. SLN identification rates (IR) in Groups 1 and 2 were 100 and 97.4% respectively, (p > 0.05). False negative rates (FNR) in Group 1 and 2 were 6.3% (1/16 patients) and 7.7% (1/13 patients), respectively, (p > 0.05). There were no major allergic reactions in either group.

CONCLUSION: In this prospective randomized trial on early breast cancer patients, accuracy of SLNB was comparable using in-house prepared, 99m Tc-antimony colloid and commercially marketed 99m Tc-sulphur colloid as radiopharmaceutical, while 99m Tc-antimony colloid was much cheaper than 99m Tc-sulphur colloid.